Sean Gourley – Mathematics of war
May 12, 2009 @ 7:38 am by NobleIn this dark new age of asymmetric warfare, this talk couldn’t be more timely.
In this TED talk, Sean Gourley develops a mathematical model to examine the composition and level of organization of insurgents in Iraq based on the timing and number of deaths in the conflict. Applying this research to other resistance situations, he stumbles across the ideal “resistance coefficient” with an alpha of 2.5, a group size and composition ideal for enabling the conflict to continue.
Alpha lower than 2.5 indicates a larger, more stable, more organized resistance that can more easily be talked to, negotiated with, bought off, infiltrated, supplied with a leader, and so on. Sinking alpha indicates resistance groups are coalescing and uniting. Alpha higher than 2.5 indicates groups that are too small and fractured to be of any real effectiveness. Rising alpha indicates the Balkanization and fracturing of groups, divide and conquer.
This suggests there are ideal group sizes and structures for resistance movements that endure. I’d like to tell you what that ideal size and structure is, but my application to the School of the Americas was denied.
This is a very basic example of the power of informatics that can come by examining aggregate group data. There is nothing new about this field of study, in warfare or other areas. Because of this fact, I’m very interested in the revelation that our actions in Iraq keep the resistance moving back towards that “sweet spot” of 2.5. Our military industrial complex is either doing everything wrong, or they’re doing everything very right (depending on the ultimate goal- hegemony or destabilization).
This informatics stuff ties right into my day job. I am fascinated by this field of study, especially when applied to human services, but unnerved by its potential to ignore and make invisible the individual person. Especially in human services, one must be able to see the trees from the forest.